InOut Games is the Curacao-incorporated, Cyprus-based studio behind Chicken Road, the step-based crash game that went from launch in April 2024 to the most searched title in the genre inside a year. It makes provably fair instant games only: crash, Plinko, Mines, dice, card and wheel formats, roughly 34 titles at the last count. This page covers who owns it, what it publishes, how its fairness model works, where it is licensed and where it is not, and how it compares with Spribe, SmartSoft, Turbo Games and BGaming.
The 30-second version
- ✓ 30+ provably fair crash games: Aviator, JetX, Spaceman & more
- ✓ 10% weekly cashback for every player, paid automatically
- ✓ Crypto only: BTC, ETH, USDT and 9 more coins accepted
- ✓ Extra value: 2x monthly bonus and up to 125 Friday Fun Spins
InOut Games trades through IOGr B.V. (Willemstad, Curacao, company number 161532) with an Anjouan supplier licence, ALSI-202506032-FI2, and a team listed in Limassol, Cyprus. It holds no UKGC or MGA licence. Its catalogue runs from 95% to 99% RTP; Chicken Road sits at 98% (2% edge) and the sequel at 95.5% (4.5% edge). Every game uses SHA-256 provably fair seeding. Distribution runs through SoftGamings, Slotegrator and NuxGame. It won Best Crash Game Portfolio at the SiGMA Asia Awards 2025 and was a Best Crash Game nominee at SiGMA Africa 2025.
Flagship RTP
98%
Catalogue
~34 games
Provably fair
Yes
Chicken Road launched
Apr 2024
Licence
Anjouan
UKGC / MGA
No
🏢 Who InOut Games are
InOut Games is a business-to-business games studio. It does not run a casino and does not sell anything to players; it builds HTML5 instant games and licenses them to operators and aggregators. Its corporate site describes the business as “a games provider for gambling and bitcoin casinos”, which is accurate and tells you where its customers are: crypto-first and offshore operators rather than the regulated European market.
The legal entity is IOGr B.V., incorporated in Willemstad, Curacao, with company number 161532. The studio’s supplier licence is issued by the Anjouan Licensing Services Inc. under the number ALSI-202506032-FI2, and press releases from its distribution partners also describe it as a Curacao licence holder. The working team is listed in Limassol, Cyprus, in both the NuxGame partnership announcement of December 2025 (“based in Cyprus”) and third-party company databases. Head count is reported as 25 in one database and “50+” in another; neither figure comes from the company itself.
The founding date is the first thing sources disagree on. Provider directories give 2020, 2021 and 2024. The most useful anchor is the release history: review databases list an InOut game called Tower in June 2022 and Plinko 1000 in July 2023, both well before Chicken Road, which launched on 4 April 2024. A 2021 founding with a small early catalogue fits the evidence best; 2024 is the year the studio became visible, not the year it started.
📝 For the record: InOut’s founding year is reported as 2020, 2021 and 2024 by different directories, and the company has not published one. We anchor to the 4 April 2024 Chicken Road launch, which is the only date the studio’s own materials and independent databases agree on. Treat “founded 2021” as the best-supported estimate rather than a confirmed fact.
What the studio makes is narrow by design. There are no video slots in the traditional sense until the 2025 arrivals of Chicken Royal and Rump And Friends; the core catalogue is crash and instant formats: step-based road games, Plinko boards, Mines grids, dice, coin flips, card ladders and wheels. The corporate site claims an average player lifetime of 12 months, localisation into more than 15 languages, support for over 100 fiat currencies and about 20 cryptocurrencies, and a back office operators can use to configure the games. The one figure to take with caution is the “12 months”; it is a marketing metric with no method behind it.
🔍 Ownership and corporate trail
InOut is privately held and has published no ownership structure. There is no parent group on record, no listed investor and no acquisition announcement. What can be traced is the management and the distribution chain.
The chief executive is named in two separate 2025 press releases: Vladislav Snak is quoted as CEO in Slotegrator’s partnership announcement of 22 October 2025 and again in NuxGame’s of 2 December 2025. Bar Konson is named as Chief Business Development Officer in the NuxGame release. One company database lists a founder and CEO under a different surname, so we treat the press-release name as the working one and flag the discrepancy below.
The distribution trail is clearer, because aggregators announce their signings. SoftGamings added InOut in a deal dated December 2024 and published in January 2025, when the catalogue was 28 titles. Slotegrator followed on 22 October 2025 with 34 titles, naming Latin America, the CIS region and Asia as the target markets. NuxGame signed on 2 December 2025. InOut’s own news page adds partnerships with Betting.bet and Rocketplay and a run of trade shows: iGB Live London, SBC Summit Lisbon and SiGMA Central Europe in Rome, all in 2025. One provider review also lists SoftSwiss as a distribution channel; we could not find an announcement from either side confirming it.
📝 For the record: Slotegrator and NuxGame both quote Vladislav Snak as CEO of InOut Games in late 2025. RocketReach lists “Vladislav Mstoian” as founder and CEO with the same company profile. The first name matches; the surname does not, and we cannot resolve it from public sources. The SoftSwiss partnership appears in one review and no press release.
The scale claims deserve one paragraph because they are used everywhere. For the SiGMA Africa nomination in March 2025 the studio published Chicken Road figures of 2,088,513 active users, $432 million in total bets, 34.1% one-month retention and “$227 average bet per session”. The first three are plausible for a game carried by 1win and 1xBet across South Asia and Africa. The last is odd: it is a session-turnover figure presented as a bet size and should not be read as what a typical player stakes per step. None of the four is audited.
🎮 The catalogue
InOut’s list moves fast (the studio told one review database it releases roughly one new title every two months, and 2025 was busier than that). The table below covers every title we could attach a published RTP to, plus the flagship line-up without one. RTPs come from the game clients, review databases or the studio’s own material; where a figure is only reported by third parties we say so. House edge is 100 minus RTP in every case.
Two things stand out. The first is the RTP spread: 95% at the bottom (Tower, Sugar Daddy, and the Chicken Road sequel at 95.5%) to 99% at the top (Triple, and HiLo Joker if the reported figure holds). A studio range of four percentage points is wide; it means “InOut games are 98%” is not a safe generalisation, and the RTP has to be read per title. The second is that the flagship’s sequel is the outlier in the wrong direction. Chicken Road 2.0 costs 2.25 times as much per bet as the original. The full explanation of what changed is on the Chicken Road 2 page.
The rest of the road line (Rabbit Road, Fish Road, Cricket Road, the seasonal Chicken Road Ice and Vegas editions) are reskins of the same step engine with different lane counts and art. We have not verified their RTPs individually and would not assume they match the original’s 98%.
🔍 Worth noting
The catalogue size is a moving figure and the studio’s partners quote different numbers at different dates: 27 or 28 in early 2025, 31 in March 2025, “30+” in June 2025, 34 in October 2025, with at least eight more titles announced for 2026. Any page that gives a single exact count without a date is quoting whichever press release it read.
⚙️ Fairness model
Every InOut game uses the same provably fair scheme, and it is the standard one used by Stake, BC.Game and the rest of the crypto-casino originals. The mechanics, using Chicken Road as the example, work in four steps.
The server commits to a secret
Before any bet, the server generates a random server seed and displays its SHA-256 hash in the game’s fairness panel. The seed itself stays hidden.
You contribute a client seed
The client seed is generated on your device and can be changed by you. Because the server did not choose it, the server cannot have pre-selected an outcome that fits it.
A nonce makes each bet unique
The bet counter increments every round. The losing step (or the Plinko path, or the mine positions) is a function of server seed, client seed and nonce, computed before you press anything.
The seed is revealed and you check it
When you rotate the seed pair, the old server seed is shown. Hash it and compare with the hash from step one. If they match, no round in that batch could have been altered after the fact. Our verification guide walks through it.
This is the same model as Stake Crash and BC.Game Crash and a stronger commitment than the RNG-only approach used by SmartSoft’s JetX, where the player has no way to audit a specific round. It is a different design from Spribe’s Aviator, which hashes a server seed together with three players’ client seeds per round; the difference does not matter for fairness, only for who contributes entropy. Our provably fair explainer covers the family of schemes.
The limit of the model is worth stating. Provably fair proves the outcome was fixed before you acted and not changed afterwards. It does not prove the RTP. If a game’s multiplier ladder pays 98% of theoretical, the seeds will confirm every result was pre-committed and the game will still take 2% of turnover. For InOut, the RTP check has to come from the published ladder (which you can verify against the per-step loss probability) and from third-party testing.
On that third-party testing, the trail is thin. Slotegrator’s October 2025 release refers to “certifications from leading international testing laboratories” and the studio’s site describes the games as certified. We could not find a certificate, a lab name (BMM, GLI, iTech Labs or any other) or a certificate number in any public document. Provably fair is verifiable by you and is the basis for our fairness verdict; the lab certification is a claim we pass on without confirmation.
💡 Key insight
Because the losing step is fixed before the round, InOut’s games cannot react to your cash-out and cannot be predicted by anyone without the server seed. That is why every “Chicken Road predictor” fails and why the game does not “know” when you are about to stop. Our is Chicken Road legit guide covers the scams built on that misunderstanding.
🛡️ Licensing and regulation
InOut’s regulatory footprint is offshore only. IOGr B.V. is incorporated in Curacao, and the studio’s partners describe it as a Curacao licence holder. Its supplier licence on public record is Anjouan, ALSI-202506032-FI2, issued by the Anjouan Licensing Services Inc. of the Union of the Comoros; the number’s date code points to June 2025. Anjouan has become the default jurisdiction for crypto-first studios and operators since Curacao’s 2024 licensing reform raised costs and paperwork, and it is a B2B supplier licence: it lets InOut sell to operators, and says nothing about the operator you play at.
What InOut does not hold is the list that matters for players in regulated markets. There is no UK Gambling Commission licence, checked against the UKGC public list. There is no Malta Gaming Authority licence. There is no Ontario, Swedish, Danish, Spanish or Italian certification that we could find. In practical terms, Chicken Road cannot appear on a UK-licensed site, an MGA-licensed site or any site in a market that requires supplier certification. Where it does appear is on Curacao, Anjouan and Kahnawake-licensed operators, which covers the crypto casinos and the large offshore sportsbooks (1win, 1xBet, Melbet and their peers) that carried it to India, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Latin America.
That is not a comment on the games’ fairness. The seeds and hashes work identically everywhere. It is a comment on recourse: a dispute with a Curacao or Anjouan operator goes to that regulator’s complaints process, not to an ADR body with statutory powers. Our crash game regulation guide covers what each licence does and does not give you.
🏆 Awards
InOut collected trade awards quickly for a studio of its size, and Chicken Road did most of the work. The list below is confined to awards we could trace to the organiser or to the studio’s own announcement.
At the SiGMA Asia Awards 2025, held in Manila in June 2025, InOut won Best Crash Game Portfolio; SiGMA’s own report of 20 June 2025 records the win and describes a portfolio of “30+ original crash and arcade-style games” with RTPs from 96% to 98%. Before that, Chicken Road was a nominee for Best Crash Game at the SiGMA Africa Awards 2025 in March 2025, which is where the studio published the player numbers quoted above. The studio was also nominated for Best Game Studio at the SiGMA Eurasia Awards 2025 and won “Industry Rising Star” at the SiGMA Central Europe Awards 2025 in Rome.
Outside SiGMA, Chicken Road took a “Game of the Year” title at the G Gate Awards 2025 (one trade report calls it “Slot of the Year”, which is the wrong category for a crash game, and the studio’s own post says “Game of the Year”), and InOut was named Game Provider of the Year at the G Gate Awards 2026. Trade awards are marketing events with paid tables and should be read as evidence of industry visibility rather than quality; the SiGMA Asia crash-portfolio award is the one with the clearest link to the games themselves.
“A studio with one 98% game and a 95.5% sequel has told you which direction it thinks the market will tolerate. The awards went to the first one.”
📈 Market position
The crash and instant-game market has a clear top tier and a crowded second one, and InOut sits at the top of the second tier on the strength of a single title. The table puts it next to the studios it is most often compared with.
Against Spribe, InOut has the better-priced flagship (98% against 97%) and none of the regulatory reach. Spribe’s licences are what put Aviator on UK, Maltese and other regulated sites and what pushed it to the 77 million monthly players Spribe claimed when it launched Pilot Chicken in February 2026. InOut has no equivalent distribution and, on current licensing, cannot get it. Pilot Chicken is the first direct assault on InOut’s format by a larger studio, and it runs at 97%, so the price advantage stays with Chicken Road for now.
Against SmartSoft, the comparison is on fairness design rather than price. JetX and Chicken Road both sit near 97% to 98%, but JetX is RNG-certified without a player-verifiable seed, which is the model regulated markets prefer and crypto players do not. Against Turbo Games and BGaming, InOut competes for the same offshore lobbies with a smaller catalogue and one much bigger hit. Turbo has more titles; BGaming has slots, which InOut only started adding in late 2025. Neither has a step-based game with Chicken Road’s search volume.
The studio’s weakness is concentration. The catalogue has one title that most players can name, and the sequel to it lowered the RTP by 2.5 points. If Chicken Road’s popularity fades, or if operators steer players to the 95.5% sequel because it earns them more, InOut’s position moves with it. Our crash games list shows where each of these studios’ games sit on RTP, and the Aviator vs Chicken Road comparison covers the flagship head-to-head.
The bottom line: InOut Games is a small, offshore-licensed studio with a provably fair engine, a wide RTP range and one exceptional game. Chicken Road at 98% is one of the cheapest crash-format games to play; its sequel at 95.5% is not. Play the original, verify the seeds, read the RTP on every other InOut title before you assume it matches, and remember that the studio’s Anjouan licence tells you nothing about the operator whose lobby you are in.
One more sentence on the hook: step-based games with a decision every two seconds keep people playing longer than they intend, and Chicken Road is the clearest case in the genre. If that applies to you, our crash gambling and harm guide is where to start.
◆
❓ Frequently asked questions
Who owns InOut Games?
InOut Games trades through IOGr B.V., a company incorporated in Willemstad, Curacao, with company number 161532. It is privately held with no parent group or investor on public record. Press releases in late 2025 name Vladislav Snak as CEO and Bar Konson as Chief Business Development Officer, and the team is listed in Limassol, Cyprus.
Is InOut Games licensed?
Yes, offshore. It holds an Anjouan supplier licence, ALSI-202506032-FI2, and its partners describe it as a Curacao licence holder. It has no UK Gambling Commission or Malta Gaming Authority licence, so its games cannot appear on UK or MGA-licensed sites.
What games does InOut Games make?
Around 34 instant games at the last partner count: Chicken Road and Chicken Road 2.0, a family of step-based reskins (Rabbit Road, Fish Road, Cricket Road), Plinko Aztec and Plinko 1000, Tower and Stairs, Mines variants, HiLo Joker, Joker Poker, Coin Flip, Triple, Battle Trades, Aviafly, and since late 2025 a few video slots such as Chicken Royal. Published RTPs run from 95% to 99%.
Are InOut Games provably fair?
Yes. Every title uses a SHA-256 commitment: the server publishes the hash of its seed before the round, you contribute a client seed, a nonce separates bets, and the seed is revealed afterwards for you to check. The studio also claims independent lab certification but has not published the lab or a certificate number.
When was InOut Games founded?
Sources disagree: directories give 2020, 2021 and 2024. Review databases list InOut titles from June 2022 (Tower), so the studio predates Chicken Road’s 4 April 2024 launch. 2021 is the best-supported estimate; the company has not published a date.
What awards has InOut Games won?
Best Crash Game Portfolio at the SiGMA Asia Awards 2025, Industry Rising Star at the SiGMA Central Europe Awards 2025, Game of the Year for Chicken Road at the G Gate Awards 2025 and Game Provider of the Year at the G Gate Awards 2026. Chicken Road was also a Best Crash Game nominee at the SiGMA Africa Awards 2025.
Is Chicken Road 2 by InOut Games better than the original?
Not on price. Chicken Road 2.0 runs at 95.5% RTP (4.5% house edge) against the original’s 98% (2% edge), so the house takes 2.25 times as much per bet. The sequel adds longer modes (30, 25, 22 and 18 steps), auto cash-out and a slightly higher theoretical ceiling of about 3.6 million times stake, with the same cash cap of about €/$20,000.